Art der Ankündigung: Veranstaltung

  • 14th William James Scholar in Residence – Prof. Anna Boncompagni

    We would like to invite you to:

    14th William James Scholar in Residence

    Prof. Anna Boncompagni, University of California, Irvine

    7 July 2026:

    Workshop I, 10am-12noon, House 11, Room 2.22: “Sense and common sense in William James”

    Lecture, 6-8pm, House 09, Room 1.14: “Pragmatism in verificationism. William James and the Vienna Circle revisited”

    Also per Zoom:

    https://uni-potsdam.zoom-x.de/j/69089935045

    Code: 96448738

    8 July 2026:

    Workshop I, 10am-12noon, House 11, Room 2.22: “James and Wittgenstein”

    Venue: University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, House 11, 14469 Potsdam

    For more information and registration:

    william-james-center@uni-potsdam.de

  • New Forms of Ownership

    Dear Colleagues,

    You are warmly invited to the workshop “New Forms of Ownership” at ZEPP on Thursday, 2 July, and Friday, 3 July 2026. The workshop brings together scholars to discuss new forms of ownership in business corporations, land, natural resources, and social infrastructure, with particular attention to employee, cooperative, steward, public, and commons-based ownership.

    The question of ownership must stand at the centre of political and social philosophy, even though its prominence has varied over time. After several decades in which it receded from view, the issue of ownership has now forcefully returned to philosophical debate. For good reasons: property and ownership shape how power, resources, and decision-making are distributed within a society, and they affect our understanding and practice of freedom, justice, and collective self-government. The workshop will address several layers and dimensions in which structures of ownership intersect with central issues in ethics as well as social and political philosophy: freedom and dependence, democratic sovereignty, workplace hierarchies, distributive justice, systemic domination, ecological concerns, and digitalization and AI.

    The workshop will also concentrate on questions of transformation and transition: how to develop practical pathways for introducing and establishing new models of ownership, and how to assess such pathways in terms of democratic legitimacy, practical feasibility, and strategic effectiveness.

    Speakers include Niklas Angebauer (University of Oldenburg), Sophie Bloemen (Commons Network), Rutger Claassen (Utrecht University), Jessica Edioke (Purpose Economy), Mike McCarthy (UC Santa Cruz), Caroline Obolensky (Hochschule St. Gallen), Elisabeth Pichler (Stiftung Verantwortungseigentum), Tanja Schomann (LMU), Jenny Stupka (FU Berlin), Jerome Warren (IfU Frankfurt), and Eva Weiler (University of Duisburg-Essen).

    We hope to welcome you at ZEPP in July!

  • Hope, Trust & Apologies. An Afternoon with Victoria McGeer

    PhEEL Conversations on Emotions and Emotion Theory

    Duisburg-Essen University

    The PhEEL Conversations on Emotions and Emotion Theory bring a prominent philosopher to the University of Duisburg-Essen to discuss issues in, or connected to, the philosophy of emotion. They present opportunities for advanced students and specialists to engage intensively and relatively informally with the author of important papers in the field. The events are organised by the Philosophy of Emotion Essen Lab (PhEEL) at the University of Duisburg-Essen.

    PhEEL Conversations I:

    Hope, Trust & Apologies. An Afternoon with Victoria McGeer

    (Princeton University & Australian National University)

    30th June 2026

    Timetable

    (I) Revisiting “The Art of Good Hope”

    14:00-15:30: Room S06 S01 A26

    (II) Apology and Trust

    16:30-17:30: Room S06 S00 A21

    To register, please send an email to Neil Roughley (neil.roughley@uni-due.de) with your name and affiliation. All registered participants will receive papers to be pre-read.

  • The Physical World and Its Perception: Phenomenology and Analytic Philosophy

    –––––

    Closing Conference of the DFG Emmy-Noether Project “A Sensible World”

    The Physical World and Its Perception: 

    Phenomenology and Analytic Philosophy 

    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 18-19 June 2026

    The aim of this conference is to explore the nature of physical reality, the way the various macro- and microscopic layers of physical reality are constituted and structured, and to what extent perception provides faithful access to the physical world. Topics to be addressed include metaphysical issues about the mind-(in)dependent existence of sensory qualities, the distinction between primary and secondary qualities (and possible differences in their perception), the relations of foundation between sensory qualities and subperceptual aspects of physical reality, the reliability of sensory contents for our cognition of the physical world, and, more generally, naive realism and competing metaphysical accounts of physical reality. The guiding idea is that a dialogue between phenomenology and analytic philosophy on these questions will be fruitful and mutually enriching, as there are important points of contact between these two traditions, in particular regarding the description and vindication of our ordinary experience of the physical world.

    Programme

    Thursday, 18 June 

    09:15-09:30 Welcome and Opening Remarks

    09:30-10:45 Michelle Montague (UT Austin)

    Presentational Phenomenology and Descriptive Metaphysics 

    11:00-12:15 Walter Hopp (Boston University)

    Phenomenological Exceptionalism

    13:45-15:00 Christian Beyer (Göttingen)

    Husserl’s View of Perceptual Content and Justification

    15:15-16:30 James Jardine (HU Berlin)

    Revisiting Husserl’s Account of Colour Constancy

    16:45-18:00 Galen Strawson (UT Austin)

    Real Direct Realism: Charles Augustus Strong

    Friday, 19 June 

    09:30-10:45 Bill Brewer (KCL)

    What are the Primary Qualities?

    11:00-12:15 Thomas Crowther (Warwick)

    Events and the Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction

    13:45-15:00 Hamid Taieb (FU/HU Berlin)

    Colours: Phenomenology and Analytic Philosophy

    15:15-16:30 Louise Richardson (University of York)

    Structural Features and Naïve Realism

    16:45-18:00 Mark Eli Kalderon (UCL)

    Perceptual Pragmatism and Objectivity

    Venue: Room 2249a, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10117 Berlin

    Attendance: Registration mandatory, please write to maria.staecker.1@hu-berlin.de  

    Organiser: Hamid Taieb (hamid.taieb@hu-berlin.de)

    For more information: www.a-sensible-world.net

    –––––

  • Semantics and Philosophy in Europe (SPE 13) & OntoBRIX

    Since some decades, ontology is used for supporting semantic analysis, both in linguistics and computing. In both fields, this lead to intensive interdisciplinary discussions between these fields and philosophical ontology. This colloquium aims at providing an interdisciplinary forum for researchers from relevant disciplines such as linguistics, computing science, information science, and philosophy. It brings together instalments of two series of events:

    • The Semantics and Philosophy in Europe (SPE) colloquia provides a forum for presenting research in the interface between linguistic semantics and various areas of philosophy (philosophy of language, philosophy of mind/cognition, metaphysics, and philosophy of mathematics). This year’s colloquium Semantics and Philosophy in Europe (SPE13) wants to foster in particular the dialogue between applied ontology, as a semantic technology in computer science, and linguistics and philosophy.
    • The newly named OntoBRIX series intends to connect researchers from the Euroregio Tyrol–South Tyrol–Trentino and beyond; it has been inaugurated with a meeting in Brixen in 2023.

    The full programme is available here:

    https://sites.google.com/view/spe13-ontobrix2026/programme?authuser=0

     

    Keynotes

    • Riccardo Baratella – University of Genova & University of Cassino: Towards a Theory of Being Apt
    • Stefano Borgo – Laboratorio della Ontologia Applicata (LOA), Trento: The usefulness of heterogeneous, unclear and vague concepts: The case of terrain vague
    • Massimiliano Carrarra – University of Padova: Compatibilism in ontology: expanding the landscape
    • Michael Gruninger – University of Toronto: Semantic Parsing for Ontology Validation
    • Giancarlo Guizzardi – University of Twente, Enschede: Explanation, Semantics and Ontology
    • Christian Kanzian – University of Innsbruck: Analogy in Contemporary Metaontology
    • Friederike Moltmann – Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Nice: The Priority of the Whole in Ontology and Semantics
    • Jakub Szymanik – University of Trento: The Cognitive Ontology of Logic: How Learnability Shapes the Universal Lexicon of Quantifiers

    Registration & Contact

    Please register here: https://forms.gle/U2UjQ7Bkr2jxxa688

    Please address all inquiries to ontobrix@gmail.com. 

    Conference fees

    There is a conference fee of 50 Euro for the whole event. The conference fee includes lunches and coffee breaks. When registering, the conference fee should be paid by bank transfer to Priesterseminar Brixen: IT64Q0604558220000000113000 (Südtiroler Sparkasse); please mention OntoBrix 2026 and the name of the participant. Social dinners will be self-paid.

    Organizing Committee

    •  Riccardo Baratella, University of Genova & University of Cassino
    • Stefano Borgo, Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA) CNR-ISTC
    • Ludger Jansen, PTH Brixen College & University of Rostock
    •  Christian Kanzian, University of Innsbruck
    • Oliver Kutz, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
    •  Giorgio A. Ubbiali, PTH Brixen College

    Adviser for S&P:

    • Friederike Moltmann, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Nice
  • 1. Alfred Sohn-Rethel Vorlesung: Counter-Planning against Climate Fascism

    Abstract der Vorlesung:

    As the climate crisis deepens, the dominant response is increasingly shaped not by justice or solidarity but by scarcity management, border violence, and the protection of privilege. Climate fascism is a political form in which ecological breakdown becomes the pretext for authoritarian control, militarised exclusion, and the unequal distribution of survival. In this context, the central question is no longer whether planning will return, but what kind of planning will govern the future. Rejecting the false choice between market solutions and technocratic state control, this lecture argues for counter-planning: a democratic, egalitarian, and ecologically grounded reorganisation of production, consumption, and social reproduction. Against green growth, carbon markets, and elite-led managerialism, counter-planning names the struggle to reclaim social coordination from capital and transform it into collective decision-making oriented toward care, sufficiency, and climate justice.

    Zur Person:

    Kohei Saito is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Tokyo. He received his Ph.D. from Humboldt University in Berlin. In 2024/25 Saito was a fellow at The New Institute in Hamburg as Chair of the program “Beyond Capitalism: War Economy and Democratic Planning”. He works on ecology and political economy from a Marxist perspective. His book, Capital in the Anthropocene (2020), selling more than half a million copies in Japan, has been credited for inspiring a resurgence of interest in Marxist thought in Japan, as well as in the USA and Europe.

  • The Epistemology of Medicine

    Dear all,

    we invite you to the Epistemology of Medicine Conference, supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Carl Friedrich von Siemens Foundation. The conference will take place on 25–26 June 2026 in Munich and will bring together leading philosophers to explore foundational questions in the epistemology of medicine.

    Please register on the homepage for participation: https://www.philosophie.lmu.de/mcmp/en/latest-news/events-overview/event/the-epistemology-of-medicine-92a34605.html

    For more information see below. 

    We hope to see you there in June! 

    ——

    The Epistemology of Medicine

    25–26 June 2026

    Carl Friedrich von Siemens Foundation

    Südliches Schlossrondell 23, 80638 Munich, Germany

    Rationale:

    This international conference brings together leading philosophers to explore foundational questions in the epistemology of medicine. How do we generate, evaluate, and integrate knowledge in medical science and practice—especially in an era shaped by big data, advanced statistics, and artificial intelligence? By examining the nature of evidence, causal reasoning, and explanatory models in health and healthcare, the event aims to clarify how different sources of knowledge can be combined to guide effective medical decision-making and policy. Through interdisciplinary dialogue, The Epistemology of Medicine seeks to advance philosophical understanding while contributing to the broader goals of improving patient care and promoting societal well-being.

    Invited Speakers:

    Organizing Committee:

    This event is generously supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Carl Friedrich von Siemens Foundation.

  • Climate Change and Animal Ethics

    Climate change raises urgent questions of justice. Yet nonhuman animals remain an extremely neglected group within dominant climate justice frameworks, despite being among the most vulnerable to climate-related harms. Habitat loss, extreme weather events, ecosystem disruption, ocean acidification, and biodiversity collapse due to climate change profoundly affect wild and domesticated animals alike.

    While philosophical discussions on climate justice have grown substantially over the past decade, they have largely focused on duties owed to present and future human populations. By contrast, comparatively little attention has been given to the moral responsibilities humans bear toward animals in the context of climate change. Few recent studies have started to investigate the ethical implications of mitigation and adaptation policies, but many open questions remain. Moreover, a significant gap concerns duties owed to animals in situations of Loss and Damage (L&D) — particularly where mitigation and adaptation measures prove insufficient to prevent serious and irreversible harm.

  • WoW 2026 – the Sixth International Workshop on Welfare and Ethics

    WoW 2026 – Sixth International Workshop on Welfare and Ethics

    1–2 July 2026

    Saarland University, Germany

    Registration 

    If you would like to attend, please send an email to workshoponwelfare@gmail.com by 15 June.

    Keynote speakers

    Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek (University of Lodz)

    Theron Pummer (University of St Andrews)

    Information on the workshop

    Considerations about the nature of welfare, the value of welfare, its distribution, or welfare-based claims and complaints are central to moral philosophy. They are of particular concern for all philosophers who take welfare to be (at least) one source for normative reasons. Evaluative and deontic considerations about welfare provide an array of fascinating philosophical questions.

    It is (quite) uncontroversial that welfare has moral value and provides moral reasons, but it is highly contested how in particular. We ought not to harm people, but ought we also benefit them? Does this include non-human animals and other agents, and does it include future people even if their existence depends on our actions? Can we aggregate people’s welfare, or should we limit the trade-offs between their harms and benefits?

    Our account of welfare has implications for ethics, but do ethical considerations also provide reasons to adopt one or another theory of welfare? What is the interaction between theories of welfare and the ethics of welfare? 

    Some lives are better and some are worse, but what constitutes their prudential value? Are well-being and ill-being analogous or do they differ in structure and relevance – and what do particular theories imply? What are the relevant underlying concepts of desire, pleasure, friendship, or other objective goods on which welfare may depend?

    This workshop provides a forum for the discussion of those and related questions. It aims at rallying scholars of philosophy to expand our understanding in these issues, and we hope to promote the philosophical engagement with ethics, welfare, and how they interact.

    Wednesday, 1 July

    11:00 – 11:15 Welcome and Introduction

    11:15 – 12:00 Jonas Harney (Dortmund University) & Luca Stroppa (University of Turin): Justifying Resolute Choice

    12:30 – 13:15 Sylvester Kollin (Stockholm University): Welfarism Reconceptualised 

    13:15 – 14:15 Lunch

    14:15 – 15:00 Paul Heller (University of Oxford): It is better if there are more kinds of good lives

    15:30 – 16:15 Adriano Mannino (Bielefeld University & UC Berkeley): Are There Supreme Evils?

    16:45 – 18:15 Theron Pummer (University of St Andrews): Future Suffering and the Non-Identity Problem

    19:30 Dinner

    Thursday, 2 July

    9:30 – 10:15 Thorsten Helfer (Saarland University): Desires Running Wild

    10:45 – 12:15 Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek (University of Lodz): On the Notion of Pleasure

    12.15 – 13:15 Lunch

    13:15 – 14:00 Travis Rebello (University of Colorado Boulder): Well-Being and Psychological Continuity

    14:30 – 15:15 Rebecca Dreier (London School of Economics): Welfare Implications of Episodic-Like Memory in Nonhuman Animals

    15:45 – 16:30 Willem van der Deijl (Tilburg University): Unnoticeable Welfare Value and Non-Experienced Welfare Goods

    18:30 Dinner

    The workshop is organised by Jonas Harney (TU Dortmund University), Thorsten Helfer (Saarland University), Maximilian Klein (Saarland University) and Hasko von Kriegstein (Toronto Metropolitan University) and generously supported by UdS Professorship for Practical Philosophy and the German Society for Analytic Philosophy (GAP e.V.).

  • Wissenschaftsfreiheit unter Druck

    Die jüngsten Eingriffe in Forschungsförderung und Hochschulorganisation in den USA haben Fragen der Wissenschaftsfreiheit mit neuer Dringlichkeit auf die öffentliche Agenda gesetzt. Suspendierte Forschungsprojekte, politische Vorgaben für Universitäten und Eingriffe in institutionelle Autonomie zeigen, wie verletzlich selbst hochentwickelte Systeme wissenschaftlicher Selbstverwaltung werden können – insbesondere dann, wenn ihre Finanzierungsstrukturen politisch konditionierbar sind.

    Diese Entwicklungen sind keine nordamerikanischen Kuriositäten. Wissenschaftliche Wissensproduktion erfolgt heute in globaler Interdependenz; zugleich finden zentrale hochschul- und wissenschaftspolitische Konfliktlinien – etwa um Diversität, Identitätspolitik, Expertenkulturen oder institutionelle Autorität – längst auch in Europa Resonanz. Hinzu treten grundlegende Fragen nach dem Verhältnis von epistemischer und politischer Macht, von Wissenschaftsfreiheit und Meinungsfreiheit, von normativer Orientierung und wissenschaftlicher Neutralität sowie nach den Grenzen zwischen Forschung und politischem Aktivismus.

    Vor diesem Hintergrund bedarf es einer vertieften Reflexion der normativen, institutionellen und politischen Voraussetzungen wissenschaftlicher Freiheit. Zwar existieren im deutschsprachigen Raum einschlägige Debatten und Forschungszusammenhänge, insbesondere in Rechtswissenschaft und Philosophie; charakteristisch ist bislang jedoch eine geringe interdisziplinäre Verzahnung. Auch die wissenschaftsnahe Wissenschaftspolitik bleibt häufig eigentümlich davon getrennt.

    Die Tagung soll unterschiedliche disziplinäre Perspektiven zusammenführen und einen Raum für gemeinsame Reflexion über Gegenwart und Zukunft der Wissenschaftsfreiheit eröffnen.

    Teil der Veranstaltung ist ein öffentliches Podium (28. Mai), das von Michael Mair (Deutschlandfunk Kultur) moderiert und im Livestream übertragen wird.

    Programm:

    Mittwoch, 27. Mai

    18:00 Uhr

    Registrierung

    19:00 Uhr

    Begrüßung

    Dinner & Dinner Speech

    Casper Hirschi

    21:30 Uhr Ende 1. Tag

    Donnerstag, 28. Mai

    08:30 Uhr Registrierung

    09:15 Uhr – 10:45 Uhr Funktionen/Zwecke/Rechtfertigungen der Wissenschaftsfreiheit

    Sabine Döring

    Klaus Ferdinand Gärditz

    Chair: Georg Schütte

    10:45 Uhr – 11:15 Uhr Kaffeepause

    11:15 Uhr – 12:45 Uhr Wissenschaft und Moral im Prisma der Wissenschaftsfreiheit

    Peter Strohschneider

    Tim Henning

    Chair: Jens Martin Gurr

    12:45 Uhr – 14:30 Uhr Mittagessen

    14:30 Uhr – 16:00 Uhr Hate speech, Tabus und Wissenschaftsfreiheit

    Judith Froese

    Christine Bratu

    Chair: Julian Krüper

    16:00 Uhr – 16:30 Uhr Kaffeepause

    16:30 Uhr -18 Uhr Folgen aus der Wissenschaftsfreiheit partizipative Rechte in der

    Wissenschaftsorganisation?

    Torsten Wilholt

    Hans Michael Heinig

    Chair: Tobias Rosefeldt

    18:00 Uhr – 20:00 Uhr Abendessen

    20:00 Uhr Herrenhausen Extra (öffentlicher Abendvortrag)

    Wissenschaftsfreiheit unter Druck? Zwischen Trumpismus und

    „Cancel Culture“

    Susanne Baer

    Tobias Dünow

    Sascha Spoun

    Moderation: Martin Mair

    Empfang bei Brezel und Getränk

    Freitag, 29. Mai

    08:30 Uhr Registrierung

    09:00 Uhr – 10:30 Uhr Wissenschaftsfreiheit und Wissenschaftsfinanzierung

    Birgitta Wolff

    Jörg Niewöhner

    Ilyas Saliba

    Chair: Manuel Hartung

    10:30 Uhr – 11:00 Uhr Kaffeepause

    11:00 Uhr – 12:30 Uhr Politische Aktivierung von Wissenschaft von oben und unten – im

    Lichte der Wissenschaftsfreiheit

    Geert Keil

    Alexander Bogner

    Uwe Volkmann

    Chair: Romy Jaster

    12:30 Uhr – 13:00 Uhr Abschlussrunde mit Tagungsbeobachtern

    Michael Zürn

    Ralf Fücks

    13:00 Uhr Kleiner Imbiss

    14:00 Uhr Ende der Veranstaltung